CAMPUS
My productivity
16 min
this page provides an overview of your overall performance 1\ productivity path campus โถ๏ธ user productivity โถ๏ธ productivity tab get a daily view of your annotation outputโpoints, tasks, objectsโand dig into each taskโs details productivity of a user controls & filters time interval select any date range by default, shows the last 7 days (daily granularity) projects filter metrics to one or more projects request type filter by request category task type choose between annotate, correct, review, or all trend charts chart what it shows annotation points per day daily sum of annotation โpointsโ (e g datasetโspecific scoring) the dotted line is your average over the selected interval tasks completed per day count of tasks you finished each day dotted line = average tip hover over any point on the chart to see the exact value and date user productivity table a pageable table listing every task in the selected range column description task clickable task id โ opens the task in the annotation tool last update timestamp of the most recent state change or submission category internal grouping (e g โproductivityโ, โtrainingโ ) type task type a = annotate, c = correct, r = review, status current status code (e g c = completed, o = ongoing, e = expired) annotation points total points earned for that task (scoring rules vary by project) annotation time total time spent on the task (formatted as hh mm) objects produced number of individual objects annotated (sum of 2d + 3d instances) shapes produced total geometries created (object frame count) 2d shapes count of 2d only shapes 3d shapes count of 3d only shapes 2\ reviewer productivity location campus > user productivity > reviewer productivity tab get a detailed view of your review performanceโtrack time spent, efficiency metrics, and feedback contributions across all your review tasks overview the reviewer productivity tab provides insights into your quality assurance work, helping you understand how efficiently you're reviewing tasks and managing time budgets this view is tailored specifically for users performing review activities controls & filters time interval select a date range to analyze projects filter metrics by specific projects request type filter by request category key performance indicator time budget usage shows the percentage of allocated review time budget you've used during the selected period this metric is calculated based on your project's hourly target per task and only includes time from the first review round of each phase green/normal using budget efficiently (โค100%) red over budget (>100%) hover over the percentage to see detailed breakdown "x hours used on y hours budget" reviewer statistics table the table displays detailed metrics for each reviewed task column description task clickable task id that opens the task details review time total time spent reviewing this task review ratio the ratio of annotation time to review time (annotation time รท review time) a higher number means you reviewed faster relative to the original annotation effort shows " " if not available time budget usage percentage of the allocated review budget used for this task color coded (red if over 100%) shows "n/a" for tasks without a review budget feedback created number of feedback items you created while reviewing this task understanding review metrics review time the amount of time you spent in review tasks during the selected interval this includes all review activities but excludes follow up reviews in subsequent rounds review ratio indicates review efficiency compared to the original annotation effort for example, a ratio of 2 5 means the review took 2 5 times less time than the original annotation this helps identify tasks that may need more review attention or training time budget usage tracks how your review time compares to the project's expected review time per task this is based on the hourly target configured at the project level and helps ensure quality review without exceeding planned resource allocation feedback created shows your contribution to team learning and quality improvement through feedback items higher numbers indicate active quality mentoring and error identification tips use the date range filter to identify trends over time compare your review ratio across different task types to understand where you're most efficient monitor time budget usage to balance thoroughness with efficiency 3\ quality alignment path campus โถ๏ธ user productivity โถ๏ธ quality alignmenttab this page provides statistics of your alignment on the expected quality and the error types youโve generated, empowering you to pinpoint your most common issues and focus on targeted improvements note the figures in the quality alignment tab that refer to errors are based on feedbackโ each โerrorโ corresponds to one feedback entry controls & filters time interval choose any date range this will affect both alignment and error content of the page projects filter by project this will affect both alignment and error content of the page request type filter by request only applicable for the error content alignment for more detailed information about the alignment statistics, you can read the general documentation for quality alignment docid\ pgncji7eztsd4pekq2pia total number of errors a summary card displaying the aggregate count of errors recorded in the selected time interval error type distribution horizontal bar chart displaying each error type and its percentage, example error type count % missingobject 2 67% feedbackerrortype 1 33% individual error breakdown a pageable table listing every feedback entry task click open task โถ to jump to the corresponding annotation reporter who left the feedback (usually a quality manager), but could be a lead, client or automatic feedback error type the error category which was selected when giving the feedback comment freeโform notes on whatโs wrong feedback date timestamp when the error was logged filters above the table allow you to show only errors from certain reporter roles (e g qm, lqm) filter by specific error types search by keyword in comments 4\ faqs q who can see my errors? a only you and users with qm/admin roles

